Comments on: Page 285…

By: Syrinx

Syrinx — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:02:42 +0000

Wouldn’t want her shoulders getting hurt, would we?

By: LdaQuirm

LdaQuirm — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:49:15 +0000

LdaQuirm> /salute
LdaQuirm salutes Silverwolf.

By: Silverwolf

Silverwolf — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:28:07 +0000

Felicity> /noclip
Alex: OMGHAX! ROFL!

By: Tobu

Tobu — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:35:42 +0000

Unless your opponent is a straight female. Or a gay male. Or blind. Or asexual. Or…

Yes.

By: Diyedas

Diyedas — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:46:59 +0000

TekServer makes a valid point.

By: TekServer

TekServer — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 05:16:46 +0000

Distraction is a very effective combat tactic. Sex appeal is a weapon in its own right …

By: Ashvati

Ashvati — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:22:48 +0000

We all know thats not the real reason they do it, but its the best reason for it to work

By: Fields

Fields — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:28:43 +0000

Typically in fantasy women value speed over protection so they use less armor than men.

By: SotiCoto

SotiCoto — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:27:02 +0000

Obviously Maklak, if minimal armour must be worn, it makes sense to have it cover the sensitive bits if nothing else. Duh.
Not sure about the whole massive-shoulder-plates thing, other than maybe to stop the arms getting hacked off. That’d be a bit of a problem too.

Aside from that, maximum dexterity = win.

By: CorrTerek

CorrTerek — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:30:41 +0000

I think Felicity’s supposed to be some kind of gypsy catgirl, so her clothing makes sense I suppose.