Comments on: Page 1044…

By: NastajiaFtw

NastajiaFtw — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 02:32:52 +0000

Sword: All hail Daniel! The king of dreamland!
Daniel: What?
Me: WHAT?!?!??!?!!??!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?

DAN IS TEH KING OV DREAMLAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dan&Nicole4evehbtw

By: Bennel

Bennel — Mon, 19 Mar 2012 03:47:28 +0000

I wish more stories had weapons argue with characters. Indiana Jone’s whip, Skywalker’s lightsaber, etc.

By: Estell Helquist

Estell Helquist — Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:56:33 +0000

Everyone has the ability to try and do astral travel. In truth, astral travel experts will let you know that it doesn’t need any special skill or talent. It is something that we all possess and are able to do as children yet forget as we grow older.

By: Snugglepuss

Snugglepuss — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:29:40 +0000

THAT’S WHY DANIEL CAN’T GO IN!!!

By: Megadorkynerdgoddess

Megadorkynerdgoddess — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:17:33 +0000

……….King Arthur is Alexanders Dad!!!!!!!! *googly eyes* whooaaa

By: Megadorkynerdgoddess

Megadorkynerdgoddess — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:15:16 +0000

WAIT! that means king arthur is still alive???? Did he ascend or something?

By: Cali

Cali — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:42:15 +0000

… YES. The whole father issue. That is exactly what my mind jumped to when I read this page and I was wondering why no one else was discussing it…

I think if we knew exactly who Dan and Alex’s father was, that would answer a LOT of questions. We’ve never met him in the comic; in fact I don’t remember him ever even being mentioned. When they go home for the holidays, they meet their mother, who seems to be single.

Have they ever met their father at all?

Also, the Arthur mention– yes, all of us immediately think of Pendragon. And I think one of the interpretations of the Arthurian myth did roughly happen in the 1200s? Which is about 600 years ago? Although I could be totally wrong.

So– going on the theory that Nico has somehow imprisoned Arthur and kept him alive for that long so he could keep the thrown to himself– it’s not inconceivable that that legendary Arthur could be the boys’ father. Technically, their mother would have only had to meet him once (somehow, don’t ask me how)… and boom, twin baby boys.

Or, alternatively, the legend goes that “the next generation’s first born…” so possibly Alex and Daniel are the grandsons of The Arthur? The way Nico worded it hints that there should be a generation gap.

Ack, there’s so many theories to choose from. I don’t know where to stop!

By: Gedece

Gedece — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:36:05 +0000

Interesting, really interesting. What I find most intriging is that normally, is the oldest son who’s the heir, but in case of twins it’s common folklore in my country that the eldest one is born after the younger one. So, if the second is the eldest it can sort of fill the definition without being the first born.

By: jmkool

jmkool — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:58:23 +0000

IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW!!!

By: Kaden

Kaden — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:34:40 +0000

In this case I’m guessing a generation within a single family. The difference in time of birth from parents to children, anywhere from 16-40 years, but probably around 25 years. However, since Arthur never stopped being king for 600 years, I think it is referring to the next generation of potential kings not the next generation of children. When a new generation is born the parents are to old to dream so the children are now the next generation of potential kings and the first born won’t be able to dream.

Sorry that still doesn’t sound as clear as it feels to me but I hope it helps.