Comments on: Page 1091…

By: Bennel

Bennel — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:48:56 +0000

Nice Nastajia pic. When’s Felicity’s turn?

By: CyanMage

CyanMage — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:20:16 +0000

Hate you? Thats a sight to behold

By: bmonk

bmonk — Fri, 21 May 2010 22:32:12 +0000

(That is, judging by the number of comments, and the historical arguments in them.)

By: bmonk

bmonk — Wed, 19 May 2010 22:13:54 +0000

Well, Scott, you seem to have hit a nerve, or several. That’s the sign of a good story, not?

By: bmonk

bmonk — Wed, 19 May 2010 22:12:37 +0000

Perhaps–I haven’t had a chance to read Lawhead. But I think the dates and places make a big difference too. One of the problems I have with Jack Whyte’s Camolud Chronicles is that he makes a big thing about retelling it historically–but then makes choices that make some of the things we know impossible. For example, Lot came from Lothian,both in the stories and in historical fact. It’s called “Lothian” because it was “Lot-ia”, or Lot’s place. But, to make his version work, Whyte moves Lot to Cornwall. And has similar problems with the Saxons.

Truth is, Arthur had to come early enough, and with enough Roman structure still existing, for Arthur to be running over the whole Roman diocese, from Cornwall and Wales, to London, to Hadrian’s wall and parts north. That means, to me, late 5th century.

By: Fadic

Fadic — Wed, 19 May 2010 06:21:51 +0000

However, picking up typos in my own messages is another thing entirely! First line of my reply, the word should read “being”.

By: Fadic

Fadic — Wed, 19 May 2010 06:20:08 +0000

@Mintark: I made a similar observation about the apostrophe beng incorrect, earlier in this page’s thread.

@Megadorkynerdgoddess: No, the apostrophe in “it’s” only signifies the contraction of “it is” and “it has”, the possessive is “its” it is one of the few exceptions to the apostrophied possesive. I am a proofreader/copyeditor, and it is my job to know these things.

By: Megadorkynerdgoddess

Megadorkynerdgoddess — Sun, 16 May 2010 23:26:29 +0000

Idk, i’ve never been good about following the new grammar rules. According to the rules I learned in elementary school (or primary school, depending on where you live) it’s is both the possesive form and ‘it is’

By: Mintark

Mintark — Sun, 16 May 2010 22:51:23 +0000

Just a minor spelling correction: In the 4th box it says “it’s purpose is…” while it should be “its purpose is…”. I don’t know if it was already pointed out, but at first glance I didn’t see anyone saying so.

By: Dan

Dan — Sun, 16 May 2010 06:10:18 +0000

Yeah that result doesn’t surprise me. I didn’t mean any disrespect to anything had done, Scott. I’m sorry if it seemed that way. I just reacted to the question asked about introducing fanservice to this series, and my view on fanservice in general.