Comments on: Page 1124…

By: SotiCoto

SotiCoto — Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:06:50 +0000

… Technically, the fact that Arthur is swearing kinda makes this the second non-kiddy-friendly page for the same reason again.

By: Snugglepuss

Snugglepuss — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:22:48 +0000

I love how Arthur reminds me of Sean Connery.

By: Paigely

Paigely — Sun, 11 Jul 2010 05:59:17 +0000

There’s usually one troll in any given bunch of readers, being a jerk just to get a rise out of the other readers. Sounds like Lax is our troll. Yep, he had a lot of chutzpah, but then look at his moniker. Lax? It doesn’t sound like a person who should be pointing fingers.

Quantity might rule over quality in the mass market, but anyone with class would opt for quality over quantity given the option. I’ve been constantly amazed how this web novel has updated religiously 5 days a week for so many years. Maybe there are others out there doing the same, but I don’t know of any others. Keep up the good work, Scott, regardless of the time it takes.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:30:35 +0000

Ah, okay. No worries then!

By: Brenan

Brenan — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:55:06 +0000

It’s not quite a profanity as I understand it. I think it ranks slightly under “damn well” in this case.

By: TedRx

TedRx — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:35:31 +0000

If YOU are a “slacker” then it must be OPPOSITE DAY. (or else I’d hate to see someone who was Hard Working … lol)

Get your stuff done, and post WHEN YOU CAN !!!

As you know by now … WE WILL BE HERE.

Peace

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:30:04 +0000

I’m enjoying the story as always, but something did occur to me: I’ve always understood the word “bloody” to be a profanity in British English. As I’m American I could be wrong, but that was my understanding. So I guess I have two questions:

1) Is my understanding of the usage of “bloody” correct?
2) And, if it is, do you feel there is a need to change the wording, Scott?

It personally doesn’t offend me, but I just wondered if it would offend others, and I know you’re very careful about keeping things family-friendly and not offending people.

By: Exxos

Exxos — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:03:13 +0000

This update should have been up at the top though instead of buried down in the comments.

By: lone woof

lone woof — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 20:51:05 +0000

wow! you guys are so supportive. I was wondering why there were no trolls here.
Scott you have lots of people that think its O.K. if you only post 2 or 3 times a week. LISTEN TO THEM!

By: bmonk

bmonk — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:53:18 +0000

The original Arthur was Welsh or Briton–so Scot would be a reasonable facsimile, as would a Breton also. Arthur might also have kept a lot of Roman influence, but that’s harder to find a suitable accent. So few people speak Latin regularly nowadays. A Breton speaker again, for the French influence? Galatia in NW Spain??

On the other hand, by moving Camelot to the 1300s, perhaps Arthur is English. So, really, Scott can do what he wants, and explain it away by a suitable positioning of Camelot…