Comments on: Page 1485…

By: Erik

Erik — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:47:53 +0000

Orion said: “Once it [the sword] has passed from one ruler to the next… You may no longer use it.”
So, if Dan uses it, Alex should be cut off from Dreamland.

By: Elliot Kane

Elliot Kane — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:32:39 +0000

Arthur’s illegitimate son – and the destroyer of Camelot.

By: Sjen

Sjen — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:52:05 +0000

Correct me if I am wrong, but in one of the Arthur flashbacks din’t he say that a pact with the nightmare realm prevented adult from entering dreamland, and he was tring to find a way around it without breaking the pact or treaty or whatever?

By: Gelyon

Gelyon — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:22:25 +0000

Heyhey, Niviene, guess you are dead wrong!

By: Dr. Krest

Dr. Krest — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:17:18 +0000

Sorry mis-said something. He can’t enter without the necklace. Oops.

But even so he should be able to enter whenever he wears it. Dan wearing it shouldn’t be an issue – they can alternate using it.

By: Dr. Krest

Dr. Krest — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:14:04 +0000

How does that make it so that Alex can’t enter Dreamland?

Since Arthur died because Nicodemus’s spell would have ceased when Nic died (or atleast I think he did) that would have taken away Dan’s inability to enter. When he wears the necklace he could be able to get into Dreamland despite his age. However, this shouldn’t take away Alex’s ability to enter since Alex can enter Dreamland without the necklace as he has done before.

The necklace being given to Dan shouldn’t cause Alex to be banned from Dreamland. If anything, the reason as to why Alex can get in – without the necklace – anyway is probably because of either his extreme connection to Dreamland’s fate – aka his destiny and actions within – or because he “believed he could fly”…his belief in Dreamland may have been so strong it’s what keeps him able to go there even now.

Let’s all remember how Peter Pan went down.

By: Kael

Kael — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:02:32 +0000

Honestly as much as Dan deserves to see Dream Land Alex has more right to be there as he works much better as a King as while Dan may have the smarts Alex has the leadership skills to bring people together. Personally I think Nastajia should call Niviene out, saying that Alex truly loves her one minute then telling Alex to surrender his right to be with her when Alex and Dan are the only way she can see her true love.

Dan should, in my mind, Abdicate the throne. Alex pretty much is the Recognized Ruler of Dreamland and Saved it from Nic giving the sword over to Dan would more then likely cause chaos.

By: Doccer

Doccer — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:37:07 +0000

Something like that, but I honestly don’t believe she sees him as trash I believe she just has a absurdly logical mind and believes that Dan being king is what is best for Dreamland so it should be done, same with letting her love and even helping her love leave her to go to the dream between dreams so Merlin could find Arthur, a quest that both of them had to now that they may never see eachother again.
Not saying I like it or even agree just that I under stand.

By: AnamCara

AnamCara — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:27:24 +0000

that might make merlin.. tree-merlin… mad. making merlin mad never seems to be a wise thing. ever. even if he’s a tree.

By: Doccer

Doccer — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:21:21 +0000

Dan and alex may be twins but Dan is the younger one. So yes it is the first borns but not nessasarily the oldest born.